Osteoporosis severa: fundamentos para su terapia farmacológica en México / Severe osteoporosis: Principles for pharmacological therapy in Mexico

Antecedentes: El presente artículo muestra la evidencia y recomendaciones de la eficacia y seguridad de las terapias hasta hoy aprobadas y disponibles en México para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis en su etapa severa o establecida, con la finalidad de establecer una postura terapéutica acerca de la eficacia y seguridad para esta etapa del padecimiento, de acuerdo con las cédulas descriptivas del Cuadro Básico y Catálogo de Medicamentos del Sector Salud en México. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y narrativa de la evidencia de teriparatida y denosumab, desde su perfil farmacológico, efectividad y seguridad derivado de ensayos clínicos, además de un análisis de las recomendaciones generales de las principales guías de práctica clínica nacionales e internacionales. Resultados: La evidencia establece que teriparatida y denosumab pertenecen a clases terapéuticas distintas, con mecanismos de acción biológicamente opuestos e indicaciones de uso claramente diferenciadas en sus respectivas cédulas, por lo cual no son sustituibles ni intercambiables en la terapia de osteoporosis severa. Ambas representan la mejor opción disponible hasta el momento para esta etapa del padecimiento. Son similares en su eficacia de prevención de nuevas fracturas vertebrales por fragilidad, con un RR de 0,35 (IC 95%: 0,22-0,55) para teriparatida, y de 0,32 (IC 95%: 0,26-0,41) para denosumab. La reducción absoluta del riesgo es mayor con teriparatida 9,3% (21 meses) que con denosumab 4,8% (36 meses). Conclusiones: Nuestros resultados concuerdan con las recomendaciones disponibles en las principales guías de práctica clínica nacionales e internacionales, por lo que son propuestas ambas terapias como consecutivas y nunca como sustitutivas.(AU)

Background: This article presents evidence and recommendations regarding the efficacy and safety of the approved and available therapies in Mexico to treat severe or established osteoporosis with the aim of developing a position regarding therapeutics in this stage of the disease, according to the descriptive cards of the National Drug Formulary of the National General Health Council of Mexico. Methods: We performed a systematic and narrative review of the evidence of teriparatide and denosumab, from their pharmacological profile, effectiveness, and safety derived from clinical trials, as well as an analysis of the general recommendations of the national and international clinical practice guidelines. Results: The evidence establishes that teriparatide and denosumab belong to different therapeutic classes, with biologically opposed mechanisms of action and indications of use, which are clearly differentiated in their respective national codes, therefore these drugs cannot be substitutable or interchangeable in severe osteoporosis therapy. Both represent the best options currently available for this stage of the disease; being similar in their efficacy in preventing new vertebral fragility fractures, with an RR of .35 (CI 95%; .22-.55) for teriparatide, and .32 (CI 95%: .26-.41) for denosumab. The absolute risk reduction is higher with teriparatide 9.3% (21 months) compared with denosumab at 4.8% (36 months). Conclusions: Our results agree with the recommendations available in national and international clinical practice guidelines, with both therapies proposed as a sequential, but not a substitute, treatment.(AU)

Severe osteoporosis: Principles for pharmacological therapy in Mexico. / Osteoporosis severa: fundamentos para su terapia farmacológica en México.

BACKGROUND: This article presents evidence and recommendations regarding the efficacy and safety of the approved and available therapies in Mexico to treat severe or established osteoporosis with the aim of developing a position regarding therapeutics in this stage of the disease, according to the descriptive cards of the National Drug Formulary of the National General Health Council of Mexico. METHODS: We performed a systematic and narrative review of the evidence of teriparatide and denosumab, from their pharmacological profile, effectiveness, and safety derived from clinical trials, as well as an analysis of the general recommendations of the national and international clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: The evidence establishes that teriparatide and denosumab belong to different therapeutic classes, with biologically opposed mechanisms of action and indications of use, which are clearly differentiated in their respective national codes, therefore these drugs cannot be substitutable or interchangeable in severe osteoporosis therapy. Both represent the best options currently available for this stage of the disease; being similar in their efficacy in preventing new vertebral fragility fractures, with an RR of .35 (CI 95%; .22-.55) for teriparatide, and .32 (CI 95%: .26-.41) for denosumab. The absolute risk reduction is higher with teriparatide 9.3% (21 months) compared with denosumab at 4.8% (36 months). CONCLUSIONS: Our results agree with the recommendations available in national and international clinical practice guidelines, with both therapies proposed as a sequential, but not a substitute, treatment.

Peripheral blood leptin and resistin levels as clinical activity biomarkers in mexican rheumatoid arthritis patients / Niveles en sangre periférica de leptina y resistina como biomarcadores de la actividad clínica de pacientes mexicanos con Artritis reumatoide

Objective. To evaluate the association between the clinical activity of RA patients and serum adipocytokines (Leptin, Adiponectin and Resistin) and inflammatory cytokines. Methods. All RA patients fulfilled ACR 1987 criteria and were treated with DMARDs. Adipocytokine and inflammatory cytokine levels were evaluated using ELISA. Results. 121 patients were included in the study. Stratifying according to DAS28 (low, moderate and high activity), there were significant differences for Leptin, Resistin, IL-6 and IL-17, however, no differences were seen for Adiponectin, TNFα or IL-1β. Clinical activity positively correlated with Leptin, Resistin, IL-17 and IL-6 levels, but not with Adiponectin, TNFα or IL-1β. Adiponectin levels negatively correlated with TNFα and positively correlated with IL-1β. IL-1β positively correlated with IL-6 and negatively correlated with TNFα and IL-17. Conclusion. Circulating Leptin, Resistin, IL-6 and IL-17 levels positively correlate with RA clinical activity in a manner independent of the subject's BMI. Complex relationships between inflammatory cytokines were observed in RA patients suggesting that other metabolic or inflammatory factors could be involved (AU)

Objetivo. Evaluar la asociación entre la actividad clínica de pacientes con Artritis reumatoide y adipocitocinas séricas (Leptina, Adiponectina y Resistina), citocinas inflamatorias (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-6, IFNγ e IL-17A). Métodos. Se seleccionaron pacientes con AR (ACR 1987) tratados con FARMEs. Los niveles de adipocitocinas y citocinas inflamatorias fueron evaluados por ELISA. Resultados. 121 pacientes se incluyeron en el estudio. La actividad clínica correlacionó positivamente con Leptina, Resistina, IL-6 e IL-17 pero no para Adiponectina, TNFα o IL-1β. Los niveles de Adiponectina se asociaron negativamente con TNFα y positivamente con IL-1β. Por su parte, IL-1β se asoció de manera positiva con IL-6 y negativamente con TNFα e IL-17. Conclusión. Los niveles circulantes de Leptina, Resistina, IL-6 e IL-17 se asociaron de manera positiva con la actividad clínica de pacientes con AR, independientemente del índice de masa corporal (IMC). Asimismo, en los pacientes con AR se observaron asociaciones complejas entre las adipocitocinas y citocinas, sugiriendo que otros factores tanto metabólicos como inflamatorios pudieran estar involucrados (AU)

Peripheral blood leptin and resistin levels as clinical activity biomarkers in Mexican Rheumatoid Arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the clinical activity of RA patients and serum adipocytokines (Leptin, Adiponectin and Resistin) and inflammatory cytokines. METHODS: All RA patients fulfilled ACR 1987 criteria and were treated with DMARDs. Adipocytokine and inflammatory cytokine levels were evaluated using ELISA. RESULTS: 121 patients were included in the study. Stratifying according to DAS28 (low, moderate and high activity), there were significant differences for Leptin, Resistin, IL-6 and IL-17, however, no differences were seen for Adiponectin, TNFα or IL-1ß. Clinical activity positively correlated with Leptin, Resistin, IL-17 and IL-6 levels, but not with Adiponectin, TNFα or IL-1ß. Adiponectin levels negatively correlated with TNFα and positively correlated with IL-1ß. IL-1ß positively correlated with IL-6 and negatively correlated with TNFα and IL-17. CONCLUSION: Circulating Leptin, Resistin, IL-6 and IL-17 levels positively correlate with RA clinical activity in a manner independent of the subject's BMI. Complex relationships between inflammatory cytokines were observed in RA patients suggesting that other metabolic or inflammatory factors could be involved.

Fenómeno de Raynaud / Raynaud’s phenomenon

El fenómeno de Raynaud se caracteriza por ataques isquémicos seguidos de vasodilatación de las zonas distales del cuerpo. Es una condición clínica frecuente en la práctica médica diaria; puede ser primario o asociado a diversas enfermedades, como las enfermedades reumáticas autoinmunitarias. Esta clasificación tiene implicaciones clínicas y terapéuticas. La revisión clínica cuidadosa del paciente es la forma más fiable y reproducible para el diagnóstico; otros métodos usados,sin embargo, se encuentran en el área experimental.Diversos factores de riesgo han sido involucrados en el desarrollo del fenómeno de Raynaud; no obstante, su patogenia no se ha dilucidado completamente, aunque es cierto que se ha descrito recientemente avances en su comprensión. Estos mecanismos descritos han impactado directamente en el desarrollo de nuevas terapias para el control de la enfermedad (AU)

Raynaud’s phenomenon is characterized by repeated daily attacks of ischemia followed by reperfusion at the a crallevel. It is a frequent syndrome found in medical practice;and it can be considered as primary or secondary to other conditions, including rheumatic autoimmune diseases.Current classification had clinical and therapeutic implications. Careful clinical evaluation is the most reliable and reproducible method in the diagnosis of Raynaud’s phenomenon. Several risk factors had been associated in the genesis of Raynaud’s phenomenon; however, its pathogenesis remains elusive although recently, considerable progress in disease mechanism had been described. Such advances are directing new lines of therapy (AU)

[Raynaud's phenomenon]. / Fenómeno de Raynaud.

Raynaud's phenomenon is characterized by repeated daily attacks of ischemia followed by reperfusion at the acrallevel. It is a frequent syndrome found in medical practice; and it can be considered as primary or secondary to other conditions, including rheumatic autoimmune diseases. Current classification had clinical and therapeutic implications. Careful clinical evaluation is the most reliable and reproducible method in the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon. Several risk factors had been associated in the genesis of Raynaud's phenomenon; however, its pathogenesis remains elusive although recently, considerable progress in disease mechanism had been described. Such advances are directing new lines of therapy.